Climate scientists who tell the truth have nothing to gain and everything to lose by challenging the official narrative. Here are a few, from the first 8 minutes..

Dr. Piers Corbyn, Climate forecaster, Weather Action:
"None of the major climate changes in the last thousand years can be explained by CO2."

Prof. Nir Shaviv, Institute of Physics, University of Jerusalem:
"There's no evidence that links 20th century global warming to anthropogenic greenhouse gases."

Prof. Philip Stott, Dept of Biogeography, University of London:
"The IPCC, like any U.N. body, is political. The final conclusions are politically-driven."

Prof. Richard Lindzen, IPCC & MIT:
"And to build the number up to 2,500 they have to start taking reviewers and government people and so on, anyone who ever came close to them. And none of them are asked to agree. Many of them disagree... People have decided you have to convince other people that since no scientist disagrees you shouldn't disagree either. But whenever you hear that in science that's pure propaganda."

Narrator: "This is a story of censorship and intimidation..."

Nigel Calder, Former Editor, New Scientist:
"We've just been told lies, that's what it comes down to...The whole thing stinks. I've seen and heard that spitting fury at anybody who might disagree with them, which is not the scientific way...The whole global warming business has become like a religion and people who disagree are called heretics. I'm a heretic. The makers of this program are all heretics."

Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace:
"I don't even like to call it the environmental movement anymore, because really it is a political activist movement. And they have become hugely influential at a global level...The environmental movement has evolved into the strongest force there is for preventing development in the developing countries."

Prof. John Christy. Lead Author, IPCC:
"I've often heard it said that there's a consensus of thousands of scientists on the global warming issue and that humans are causing a catastrophic change to the climate; well I am one scientist and there are many who simply think that is not true."

Prof. Paul Reiter, IPCC & Pasteur Institute, Paris:
"We imagine that we live in an age of reason. And the global warming alarm is dressed up as science. it's not science - it's propaganda...This claim, that the IPCC is the world's top 1,500 or 2,500 scientists, you look at the bibliographies of the people and it's simply not true. There are quite a number of non-scientists... Those people who are specialists but don't agree with the polemic and resign, and there have been a number that I know of, they are simply put on the author list and become part of this 2,500 of the world's top scientists."

Prof. Tim Ball, Dept of Climatology, University of Winnipeg:
"If the CO2 increases in the atmosphere as a greenhouse gas, then the temperature will go up, but the ice core records show exactly the opposite. So the fundamental assumption, THE most fundamental assumption of the whole theory of climate change due to humans is shown to be wrong."

Dr. Roy Spencer, Weather Satellite Team Leader, NASA:
"Climate scientists need there to be a problem in order to get funding."

Prof. Patrick Michaels: University of Virgina:
"The fact of the matter is that tens of thousands of jobs depend on global warming right now. It's a big business."

Prof. Philip Stott, Dept of Biogeography, University of London:
"It's become a great industry in itself. And if the whole global warming ferago collapsed, there would be an awful lot of people out of jobs and looking for work."