futuregraph forecast ~ trump rallies ~ landslide polls ~ election fraud ~ energy speech ~ trump landslide 2 ~ trump landslide 3

An Unprecedented Six Rallies A Week ~ Up to 50,000 Attend ~ Standing Room Only

The lying media ignores them all, except when Clinton-paid thugs provoke an incident

Facebook C-Span Youtube Twitter Instagram Trump News The Trump Org

Trump on the Issues

1980 [VIDEO]
DONALD TRUMP: I would dedicate my life to this country, but I see it as being a mean life. And I also see it as---that somebody with strong views, and somebody with the kind of views that are maybe a little bit unpopular, which may be right, but may be unpopular, wouldn't necessarily have a chance at getting elected against somebody with no great brain but a big smile."

volunteer to exit poll at:

[no names!]

Phony Polls: CHECK
Media Complicity: CHECK
Electronic Voting Fix: CHECK
Election Day Operatives: CHECK
Discredit Your Opponent's Landslide: CHECK

Mediated ~ Bias ~ Pollster chooses participants ~ No transparency

Autonomous ~ Impartial ~ Open to all participants

How to hide a landslide: Ridicule and belittle anyone who mentions it.

Programmer Under Oath Tells How Electronic Vote Fraud is Done

Electronic Vote Fix Caught on Camera! [LINK]

2006 Audio Emerges of Hillary Clinton Proposing Rigging Palestine Election
'We should have made sure that we did something to determine who was going to win'

Elliot Crown of NY testifies that software stole votes in ALL 'Hillary won counties

Texas County Switches to Paper Ballots after Software Glitch

Some Cities Want Their Immigrants to Vote

2 Investigators: Chicago Voters Cast Ballots From Beyond The Grave

Maryland Trump Supporter: They Switched My Vote to Hillary

Two women busted for election fraud in Miami-Dade

Man Charged With Filing Fake Voter Registration Applications in Va.

D.O.J. gets in the vote theft game

Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller: We Are Seeing RECORD BREAKING Voter Turnout in Texas... and it's ALL FOR TRUMP

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/06/media-dirty-tricks-cbs-nbc-manipulate-polling-data-show-hillary-lead-trump/ MEDIA DIRTY TRICKS: CBS, NBC Manipulate Polling Data to Show Hillary with Lead Over Trump LEAKED CLINTON DOCUMENTS: Discourage Trump Supporters with Crap Polls Trump will win the election and is more popular than Obama in 2008, AI system finds You know there's reason to worry when...
NPR: 5 Reasons Not To Worry About A 'Rigged' Election

How Elections Are Won: Voting Machine Fraud [VIDEO]

Watch Where Your Vote Goes!

Report: Votes Switched From Trump to Clinton in Texas

More Reports of Votes Flipping in Texas; Election Operatives dismiss concerns!

Texas County Switches to Paper Ballots after Electronic Voting Glitches

CBS4 Investigation Finds People Voting Twice

DMV Computer Outage Raises Fear Of Election-Day Cyber Attacks

Reports of Potential Voting Trickery in 2016 Presidential Election

Snopes: Vote flipping in Texas unsubstantiated.

Snopes Caught Lying For Hillary Again, Questions Raised

Chicago BOE flipped from Bernie to Hillary

Anonymous: Election Fraud - Don't Allow Certification

Voting Machines in Maryland, Illinois Rigged to Support Democrats

Democracy Now
"[T]he reality is that we are voting in black boxes and that the governors and secretaries of state of these key swing states—but wherever you have a governor and secretary of state from the same party, be they Democrat or Republican, they have the power, under the electronic voting system, to flip the outcome of an election, with no verifiability, because the courts have ruled that these privately owned voting machines have proprietary software. It’s a nightmare. And it’s not democracy. I mean, Bernie Sanders has shown that the election—that the campaign finance is rigged, that the economy is rigged. Why wouldn’t they take the very small next step to rig the electronic voting machines?"

more to come...


No transparency, no proof, only the word of liars and scoundrels...

Will Hillary "pull ahead" in preparation for the electronic vote flip and a "big win"?

Nearly all the polls not done by the rabidly partisan media show a Trump landslide.

The rabid partisan media calls those polls "garbage."

They say it's wishful thinking to insist they're legitimate..

... so what's it called to insist they're illegitimate?

Trump: Phony polls put out by phony media

WaPo's attempt to subdue suspicion?
Clinton lead shrinks by 8 points





Politico: Clinton leads Trump by 7 in Pennsylvania

WaPo: A new Florida poll illuminates Donald Trump's ridiculously narrow path to victory

FOX News: Trump gaining with independents

CBS: Poll: Hillary Clinton holds narrow lead over Donald Trump

NBC: Reality check on Trump's poll numbers: They've been incredibly consistent

Reuters: More Republicans expect Clinton, rather than Trump, to win U.S. election

Daily Caller: Clinton earned 46 percent, and Trump finished closely with 41 percent.

Jacksonville.com: Clinton leads Trump by four points — 43 percent to 39 percent

Chicago Tribune: Donald Trump leads by 2 points in pivotal Florida, new poll shows

Statesman poll shows Trump with 7-point lead over Clinton

MSNBC: RNC in legal trouble over Trump call for poll-watchers

AZ Central: Poll: Clinton up 5 points over Trump in Arizona

AOL: Trump's poll numbers dive as GOP stronghold Texas comes into play

Independence UK: The AP-GfK poll: Ms Clinton over Mr Trump, 51 to 37

FREEP: Donald Trump narrows Hillary Clinton's lead to 7 in Michigan

Endless phony polling data..

A glimpse of reality...

50,000 Supporters Arrive To A Florida Trump Rally

while at the very same time in Florida...

30 Supporters Show up for A Kaine Rally

Yet Trump has a "two point edge"? There's gullible, and then there's idiotic.

Gloomberg: Trump Has 2-Point Edge in Florida

The truth is out there...

Early Voting In Florida Shows Trump Winning Election By Landslide


New Information Supports Trump Win and Possible Landslide

Byron York: Mike Pence cheers the polling skeptics

Internal Polls: Trump Landslide [video]

Trump is leading in a landslide at 70%

Proof the Polls Are Phony to Enable A Steal

Media Hiding Proof Trump is Winning

Great Trump Video from the Alex Jones Channel

Here's The 30 Seconds After The Last Debate That CNN Would Rather You Didn't See

Fake Websites, Fake Polls, Fake News, Fake Leaks: The Desperate Maneuvers of the Losing Clinton Campaign

Electoral College via UPI/CVoter state tracking poll: Trump leads with 49.38% / Clinton with 46.89%

New National Poll of 50k People Has Dramatically Different Outcome Than Media Polling

BY THE NUMBERS=> Here Is Proof of the Looming Trump Landslide

Majority of snap polls show Trump won all three debates by a landslide

Trump 54% and Stein 20% leads Clinton

Trump By A Landslide?

Phony Polls

EXPOSE: Clinton Campaign and DNC Incite Violence at Trump Rallies

Populist Hero Donald Trump Incites Boos from Elite

Anti-Trump Violence Sweeps the Nation, Media Ignores

More proof that patriotism is alive and well in America - how many do you think are voting for Hillary?

.. Poll: National Anthem Protests Leading Cause For NFL Ratings Drop

Real news on this page..
Anonymous Warns Trump Of Election Fraud

100,000 ZIP Poll: Trump Landslide Win

50,000 In 50 States: Trump Landslide Win

Google Trends Indicate Trump Landslide Win

Professor Helmut Norpoth Predicts: Trump Will Win

Professor Alan Lichtman Predicts: Trump Will Win

ANONYMOUS: Trump Landslide Win [video & transcript]

ANONYMOUS: The Polls Are Rigged [video & transcript]

ANONYMOUS: Electronic Voting Machine Rigging [video & transcript]

ANONYMOUS: Media Dirty Tricks [video & transcript]

Please Share These Landslide LINKS


Disputed Presidential Elections Are Nearly As Old As The US Presidency

Criminalizing law & order...

DOJ Warns Efforts to Stop 2016 Voter Fraud Could "Violate" Federal Law

Soros-Connected Company Provides Voting Machines In 16 States

Computerized Vote Rigging Is Still the Unseen Threat to US Democracy: It's Time to Change the System

New Podesta Email Exposes Strategic Playbook for Rigging Polls by "Oversampling"

What Republicans? Just us Globalists here..

Absentee Ballot Fraud Exists. Republican Restrictions Won't Stop It

Caught on Tape: Democratic Election Official Admits, 'There is a Lot of Voter Fraud'

Absentee Ballots Smashes Records In Minnesota

Postal Worker Brags About Ripping Up Absentee Ballots For Donald Trump

Prosecutors, FBI investigating allegations of absentee vote fraud in Berkeley

Electronic Voting Fraud: A Real Threat to Any Democrat Running for President

Obama Warned of Rigged Elections Back in 2008

U.S. vote authorities warned to be alert to Russian hacks faking fraud - officials

Secret History of Democrats and Fixed Elections

This is why Trump will question the outcome of the election - and you should too

Voter Suppression: Corporate Media Declare Victory for Hillary Clinton Weeks Before Election

Poll: Voters Have Concerns Over Election Security

8 Times Liberals Claimed An Election Was Stolen Or Rigged

Nearly Half of Voting Americans Doubt US Election Will Be Fair

Trump Claims "Large-Scale" Fraud Takes Place in US Amid First Voting Results

Vote-Riggers Visited White House Hundreds of Times

ABC Hypocrites Ridicule Donald Trump for suspicion of election fraud

Poll: 41 Percent of Voters Say Election Could be 'Stolen' from Donald Trump

Can the 2016 election be rigged? You bet

Insider Warns Of Election Fraud - Info Wars

Trump Recruits Monitors for Polling Places


Trump Says Polls Showing Clinton Winning Are 'Phony.' His Argument Is Ludicrous

Online Polls Are "Garbage," But Fox News Still Cites Them

Delusional: Trump brags he won 'every' garbage online poll but scientific polls are 'meaningless'

New Reuters Poll Proves Trump's Campaign is Almost Literally a Pile of Garbage

Fox News memo to staff: Stop promoting unscientific garbage online polls

CNN just called all polls showing Trump won "Garbage"

Trumpers say he won debate because of fake online polls. Sad!

SNARK: How I know Donald Trump is going to win the election in a landslide


Conducting an election poll may seem simple: ask a group of voters across the political spectrum which candidate they support. But not according to Polling Experts. They claim it's a complex process that requires very specialized knowledge. One Polling Expert kindly explained it to me on Breitbart after I expressed my preference for the autonomy and impartiality of digital polls:

"[M]argin of error (which indicates the result of a calculation that shows how much the opinions of the real group that the sample is supposed to represent can diverge from the number given by the poll; a good margin of error is about 3%, and the lower it is, the more serious the poll is, whereas a margin of 5% and higher means that it's probably too biased to be useful) The extent to which the sample group is representative of the entire population (this largely depends on methodology, and is more complicated to assess as the reader of a poll, because it has to do with WHAT measures the pollster took to guarantee that the sample isn't biased, and there are different methodologies out there; what is certain is that a poll that doesn't even mention this point cannot be used). What you need is a REPRESENTATIVE sample, and it's because that's VERY hard to obtain, that you cannot possibly create a sample of tens of thousands of people all while still having a reasonably low margin of error. I'm not claiming that the people who designed the first poll you mentioned are necessarily "agenda poll" people. To me, it rather seems that they don't have any polling experience, and just invented a way of polling themselves. That COULD result in a valid poll, in theory, of course. But once you get to 50.000 large samples, that becomes truly impossible, no matter WHAT methodology you use, you see?"

Well, maybe after my eyes uncross.


Most 'official polls' now show Crooked Hillary pulling ahead, so we're grateful for those polls that show Mr. Trump in the lead by a point or two. But is gratitude appropriate when his lead is actually far higher, according to the other polls?

Has the press finally convinced us that the most popular candidate in American history is truly running neck & neck with the most corrupt? That the excitement on the ground means nothing and the digital polls are "garbage"?

Six Globalist Media Giants Own 90% of What We Read, Watch & Listen To

so it's no surprise that...

91% of the Media Coverage of Populist Trump is Hostile

or that...

It is Now Totally Legal for the Media To Lie

or that...

Only 6% of Americans Trust The Media

that results in this...

Trump Leading 67% to Clinton's 19% in National Poll of 50,000 Voters

denied by disinfo like this...

No matter how garbage the poll, if it shows that Donald Trump won the debate, he'll endorse it

to believably pull off this...

Rigging an election: Professor proves electronic voting machines are ridiculously bereft of security

Anonymous Warns Trump of Democrat Election Fraud LINK

Expect Electronic Machines To Be Hacked ~ Be Prepared ~ Don't Allow Certification

More and more people are becoming concerned that the stage has been set and the fix is in for election fraud to steal the upcoming election and award it to Hillary Clinton....The Democrat candidate is a career criminal with failing health and yet the polls show her rising and the man of the people slumping. His crowds dwarf hers, easily drawing ten times the number of enthusiastic supporters to her bussed in union members. Corrupting the polls is part of the process of stealing the election, a fact that Anonymous has picked up on as well.

Anonymous has a message for the Trump campaign, a warning of election fraud that is already underway. The spokesman says, "The fake polls are setting up a Hillary Clinton win by electronic vote machine hacking. The media polls are already reflecting the flipped vote." He implores the American people, “Don’t let this be the greatest vote theft of all time."

"The fake polls are framing Hillary's win as a plausible outcome," he warns,"while the electronic voting machines were made to be hacked, and oh they will be. You think the global elite will allow a loss of power? We doubt it. Hillary will win unless adequate counter measures are activated to mitigate the vote hacking."

He says, "Here is one way Trump can prevent the greatest election theft of all time. One way is to send a team of two exit pollers, one statistician and one attorney, to each precinct in the swing state districts where it will be stolen; Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida, Virginia, North Carolina, etc, the swing states. When shenanigans are identified, and there will be many, the team needs to activate an official complaint and go file on the same day. Don’t wait, that’s what they want is a delay while the election gets certified in the background.

"It has to be a legal complaint that brings the cops in and maybe the government," he says. "The media polls are already reflecting the flipped vote. It's common knowledge the electronic voting machines can be hacked to flip the vote from one candidate to another."

He points out, "The current polls show Hillary as gaining and Trump slumping are in reality reversed. This is a setup, all laying the foundation for flipping Hillary's horrendous popularity with Trump’s huge popularity. So when they flip the votes in the swing states districts to squeak it out for Hillary, she'd begrudgingly go along with the result and the evil guys win."

He says, "Just look at Hillary's crowds and Trump's crowds and the recent polling sequence since the beginning of the year and it's easy to see that as Trump's crowds get bigger and Hillary's smaller, the polls reflect Hillary's lead inching forward and Trump's polling slumping."

Anonymous says, "It's clear the globalists' media is prepping for the vote flip in those key swing states district precincts. Trump's team needs to identity those precincts and those districts in those swing states that the globalists are targeting for the vote flip. They have the calculation of which little precincts they will send in agents to flip the vote of the electronic voting machine with a cell phone. Be alert of this move."

"Someone get word to the Trump team," says Anonymous. "This is the only way he can win. Anonymous and the collective will be monitoring. What will we be monitoring? Well, that, we cannot tell you. Operations Voter Fraud will engage November 8th."

Hello Friends and Readers – As a defender of the US Constitution against the globalist Fascists who are attempting to destroy the United States, censorship is an unfortunate reality. Much of the media, including social media, is under the control of the anti-American globalist camp. Please like me on my New Facebook page that I’ve created in response to strangulation censorship. Find me at Stop The Takeover, https://www.facebook.com/StopTheTakeover/ and please follow me on Twitter @RickRWells I’d also appreciate it if you SUBSCRIBE in the right sidebar on my website at http://RickWells.us, as there’s no telling what the America-hating nation pirates will do next. Thanks, Rick

Trump Landslide Win - Overwhelming Evidence [VIDEO]

Media Hiding New Evidence Proving Trump Is WINNING

There's no doubt about it. The liberal media's polls are rigged from the bottom up. How do we know this? Simple social media.
Trump's following on the local social media network absolutely blow Clinton out of the water. Allow me to prove it...
Trump: 10,174,358 likes
Clinton: 5,385, 959 likes
Trump nearly doubles the amount of likes than Clinton now. Some people follow Trump who don't like him, so let's look at some posts.. here's the stats for his latest Facebook livestream...
Trump livestream posts 21 hours ago:
1.1 million views

Clinton livestream posts 25 hours ago:

Since Clinton has zero shares, here's the next-best original posts I could find from Clinton, albeit it's not a livestream, post - Clinton post, 30 hours ago:

Any way you slice it, Trump is crushing Clinton on Facebook interaction. One quick note regarding Facebook: You'll find that on almost half of Clinton FB posts, the top comments are from Trump supporters, whereas the top comments on Trump's page are hardcore supporters only.

Trump: 10.6 million followers
Hillary: 8.1 million followers
Trump has 30% more Twitter followers, and they translate into real votes. A recent study confirmed that 70% of his followers are real supporters, and 90% of those real followers have a voting history.

Hillary's Twitter army is likely made up of dead voter and illegals.

YOUTUBE livestream..
Trump: averages 30,000 live viewers per stream
Clinton: averages 500 live viewers per stream

Trump has 5900% more live viewers than Clinton.

Trump: 2.2 million followers
Clinton: 1.8 million followers

Trump has 22% more Instagram followers, which is impressive considering it's a liberal cesspool consisting of college hipsters who can't seem to take enough selfies.

Trump: 197,696 subscribers
Hillary: 24,429 subscribers
Hillary for Prison: 55,228 subscribers

Hillary for Prison's REDDIT feed has more than double subscribers of Hillary's REDDIT page, equating to Trump having 700% more REDDIT subscribers.
Don't listen to the lying media. The only legitimate attack they have left is Trump's poll numbers. Social media proves the GOP nominee has strong foundation and a firm backing. Understand this: CNN and MSNBC poll numbers are fake. Anonymous prediction: Trump will win the White House. We are Anonymous.


"Based on the stats we see, he looks strong," says Ric Militi, co-founder of San Diego-based Crazy Raccoons, maker of the Zip question and answer app. His app poses questions and polls responses based on an average of 100,000 daily users. "I go with Trump, based on what we see."

How can Zip's results be so different?
"We're not a poll. We're a conversation, and 100% anonymous," Militi says. "People feel comfortable answering questions without fear of being bullied or being called a racist. People can express themselves safely, and you get a pure answer."

Militi and Zip co-founder Alanna Markey guested on an extended #TalkingTech podcast episode, explaining why they believe their app can become the "Google of opinions" by using the power of social media instead of calling people on the phone to get their opinions.

Zip, which launched in February, tells [citizens] the app "resolves debates and sparks conversation," and suggests that folks use the app to "settle bets, win arguments, find a pick-up line and earn bragging rights." Folks can either pose or answer questions and see the instant results from a cross-section of demographics and geography.

Some Zip questions: "New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?"

Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton.

"California, who you voting for?" Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton.

Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. "These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries," he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.

Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. "What do they know about these people?" Rivers says. "We worry a lot about who we're talking to."

So either the traditional polls are right or Militi is onto something, with a different way of polling that lets citizens answer more openly. We'll find out on Nov. 8, when voters go to the real polls.



For months the mainstream media has conducted a number of skewed polls with results taken from small samples in areas that predominantly vote towards one political ideology (Democrat).

The Arizona Freedom Alliance Conducted a poll of 1000 people from every state and intentionally called 33% Democrats 33% Republicans and 34% Independents with a total of 50,000 people being polled. The results were Trump winning by a landslide. Constitution.com reported: "We've been telling you the difference between a media poll and an internal poll. Media polls are driven by the desire to achieve a certain outcome.

The media is jerking our chain. DO NOT believe them. The only polls that can be believed are internal polls that are rarely made public. While the poll below is not an internal poll, it was done in a most interesting manner - with no perceived bias. And it is YUGE!"

"We have just completed our own poll since we cannot get factual information from the mainstream media!! We called 1000 homes in each of the 50 states and asked basic questions on the economy, terrorism, immigration and presidential pick. Economy was the number one factor that Americans are concerned about and terrorism was number two."

Presidential pick was Trump by a large percentage. Trump 33478 votes 67% Clinton 9788 Votes 19% Undecided or other 6739 votes 13%."

Google Trends Indicate Trump Landslide LINK

Ethan Pepper
August 30, 2016

Google results indicate strong Trump support.

A friend of mine recently asked me if I had ever seen a Hillary Clinton yard sign in real life. After giving it some thought, I realized that the answer to that question was no. I searched Google for Trump terms and was surprised by the results.

Without giving out my address, let's just say that I live in a very blue state. Shockingly, I have never actually seen any houses showing support for Hillary Clinton. After realizing this, I decided to fire up Google and see what the data looks like.

First off, I wanted to see which candidate was getting more searches. Not surprisingly, Donald Trump is absolutely crushing it in search frequency. By just how much? Almost three times as much!

Granted, average monthly searches are not an indicator as to who is going to win the election. However, it does show just how important it is to have a totally unbiased search engine that does not favor one candidate over another.

Next, I wanted to compare how often people were googling the phrases "Clinton sign" and "Trump sign". As expected, Trump is destroying Hillary in campaign sign searches as well.

Obviously, not everyone who looks up political signs are going to purchase them. But, it's pretty obvious that Trump has more people interested in supporting his movement versus the number of people Hillary has supporting her ... turn? Regardless, let's take a look at presidential sign searches over the years and see which candidates ended up winning.

Kerry vs Bush 2004

Obama vs McCain 2008

Obama vs Romney 2012

One thing that I found interesting was that Romney did have a slight edge over Obama in sign searches. Although, if the Trump versus Hillary sign searches resemble anything like the 2008 election, Hillary Clinton is going to lose and she's going to lose big time.

Moving on, let's take a look at a few more related search phrases to see if they could indicate a landslide for Trump. The theme we're going to be looking at here is merchandise searches.

Hillary's Keyword Data

Trump's Keyword Data

First off, I find it hilarious that "Hillary for prison shirt" is getting more searches than "Hillary bumper sticker". The fact that Hillary can hardly get people to organically search for her merchandise should be a pretty telling sign that the general population really has no support for Hillary Clinton. The one thing that we know for certain is that not many people are buying her shit.

Trump may be destroying Hillary in merchandise and slogan searches, but what other search terms could help indicate a Trump landslide? Before I move on to that, I just want you to take a look at the line graph for slogan searches. Hillary's low energy, "I'm with Her" slogan has barely seen a blip of growth compared to Make America Great Again.

How pathetic! The next area I looked into was what the data looks like for how often people are Googling "Clinton rally," "Trump rally," and I even threw in "Sanders rally" just for fun. As you can imagine, Trump blows Crooked Hillary out of the water. But, what about Sanders? He had thousands of passionate people lining up to see him too, right?

I'm well aware that just because people are Googling "Trump rally" it doesn’t necessarily mean they will attend. However, "Trump rally near me" is more popular than both Hillary and Bernie combined. Sorry, Hillary ... no one wants to even hear you speak.

In conclusion, I had one more phrase that I wanted to examine: "policies". Except -- this time -- I wanted to tweak my search settings to get data from each state individually. The conclusion I drew was that the phrase "Trump's policies" was not just a more popular search in each swing state, but in every state in the union. The closest to comparable results was Virginia.

Obviously, just because Trump yields more hit results doesn't mean people will like his polices better. I contend the most interesting thing to take away from the above image is that Hillary's policies have lost significant interest over time.

Finally, I'm unsure if Google's data may indicate a landslide for Trump. I'm only confident that people -- since Obama has taken office -- are bound to be butt hurt by the end of this election.

BIO Ethan Pepper: With over 5 years experience in content management, internet marketing, social media and search engine optimization - Ethan Pepper has decided to utilize his technical abilities to help fight Globalism.


Professor Allan Lichtman says Donald Trump is headed for a win - he's predicted 30 years of presidential outcomes correctly....

Professor Allan Lichtman...has correctly predicted every presidential election since 1984...[H]e uses a system of true/false statements he calls the "Keys to the White House" to determine his predicted winner. And this year, he says, Donald Trump is the favorite to win.

The keys, which are explained in depth in Lichtman's book "Predicting the Next President: The Keys to the White House 2016" are:

1. Party Mandate: After the midterm elections, the incumbent party holds more seats in the U.S. House of Representatives than after the previous midterm elections.
2. Contest: There is no serious contest for the incumbent party nomination.
3. Incumbency: The incumbent party candidate is the sitting president.
4. Third party: There is no significant third party or independent campaign.
5. Short-term economy: The economy is not in recession during the election campaign.
6. Long-term economy: Real per capita economic growth during the term equals or exceeds mean growth during the previous two terms.
7. Policy change: The incumbent administration effects major changes in national policy.
8. Social unrest: There is no sustained social unrest during the term.
9. Scandal: The incumbent administration is untainted by major scandal.
10. Foreign/military failure: The incumbent administration suffers no major failure in foreign or military affairs.
11. Foreign/military success: The incumbent administration achieves a major success in foreign or military affairs.
12. Incumbent charisma: The incumbent party candidate is charismatic or a national hero.
13. Challenger charisma: The challenging party candidate is not charismatic or a national hero.


Forecast Model Batting 5 for 5 (since 1996)

by Professor Helmut Norpoth

[T]he PRIMARY MODEL, with slight modifications, has correctly predicted the winner of the popular vote in all five presidential elections since it was introduced in 1996. In recent elections the forecast has been issued as early as January of the election year.

It is a statistical model that relies on presidential primaries and an election cycle as predictors of the vote in the general election.

After two terms of Democrat Barack Obama in the White House the electoral pendulum is poised to swing to the GOP this year.

Donald Trump is predicted to defeat Hillary Clinton by 52.5% to 47.5% of the two-party vote.

Presidential elections going back as far as 1912 are used to estimate the weight of primary performance. It was in 1912 that presidential primaries were introduced. That year the candidate who won his party's primary vote, Woodrow Wilson, went on to defeat the candidate who lost his party's primary vote, William Howard Taft. As a rule, the candidate with the stronger primary performance wins against the candidate with the weaker primary performance. For elections from 1912 to 2012 the PRIMARY MODEL picks the winner, albeit retroactively, every time except in 1960.

For elections prior to 1952 all primaries were included. Beginning in 1952, only the New Hampshire Primary has been used, as a rule. South Carolina has been added to gauge primary performance this year. Hillary Clinton enjoys strong support in a large group of voters, African-Americans, who are few in numbers in New Hampshire. Her combined performance in New Hampshire and South Carolina gives her a higher primary score than Sanders. As a result, in the general election Clinton fares less badly against Trump than does Sanders.

An earlier forecast, which garnered much notoriety, predicted a Trump victory over Clinton with 97% certainty. That prediction was made before the Democratic primary in South Carolina was held and relied on polling reports for that state. Clinton wound up beating Sanders by a much bigger margin than was indicated by pre-primary polls. Still, it is 87% certain that Trump will defeat Clinton in November.

87%-99% Certain Trump Will Be President

ANONYMOUS: Electronic Vote Machine Hacking [VIDEO]

The Fake Polls are Setting Up Hillary Clinton Win

"Good evening, brothers and sisters. We are here to talk about a message to the Trump Team. The Fake Polls are Setting Up Hillary Clinton Win Via Electronic Vote machine hacking. The media polls are already reflecting the flipped vote. Don't let this be the greatest vote theft of all time. The fake polls are framing a Hillary's win as a plausible outcome, while the electronic voting machines were made to be hacked and Oh, they will be. You think the global elite will allow a loss of power? We doubt it. Hillary will win unless adequate countermeasures are activated to mitigate the vote hacking.

Here is one way Trump can prevent the greatest election theft of all time: One way is to send a team of two exit pollers, one statistician and one attorney to each precinct in the swing state districts where it will be stolen: Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida, Virginia, North Carolina, etcetera - the swing states.

When shenanigans are identified, and there will be many, the team needs to activate an official complaint and go viral the same day. Don't wait - that's what they want is a delay, while the election gets certified in the background. It is to be a legal complaint that brings the cops in and maybe the government.

The media polls are already reflecting the flipped vote. It's common knowledge the electronic voting machines can be hacked to flip the votes from one candidate to the other. The current polls showing Hillary's gaining and Trump slumping are, in reality, reversed. This is a set-up, all laying the foundation for flipping Hillary's horrendous popularity with Trump's huge popularity so that when they flip the votes in the swing state districts to squeak it out for Hillary, she'd begrudgingly go along with the result and the even guys win.

Just look at Hillary's crowds and Trump's crowds and the recent polling sequence since the beginning of the year and it's easy to see that as Trump's crowds get bigger and Hillary's smaller, the polls reflect Hillary's lead inching forward and Trump's polling slumping. It's clear the globalists' media is prepping for the vote flipping in those key state district precincts.

Trump's Team needs to identify those precincts in those districts in those swing states that the globalists are targeting for the vote flip. They have the calculation of which little precincts they will send in agents to flip the vote of electronic voting machine with a cell phone. Be alert of this move. Someone get word to the Trump Team - this is the only way he can win. Anonymous and the Collective will be monitoring - what will we be monitoring? Well that we cannot tell you. Operations Voter Fraud will engage November 8th.

We are Anonymous. Expect us.

ANONYMOUS: Why Trump will Win and Why The Polls are Rigged! [VIDEO]

Greetings, World. We are Anonymous...

Well, based on these numbers reflecting a huge Clinton lead, we must assume that Donald Trump has no chance. Why even bother voting? Many who are influenced by the polls will conclude that nothing will ever change because [?] the polls say so.

As people share their doubts about the viability about a Trump presidency, the doubt spawned by the polls will grow like wildfire. The polls' negative projections about Donald Trump's chances will cause all but the diehard supporters to lose interest because their candidate cannot win.

As the principle of groupthink kicks in, the doubt in Trump's chances will spread exponentially. Why? Because some poll told them that was the case. Hence, this is how polls can help determine election outcomes.

The polls are often wrong. The polls have a very poor track record of being correct. Even the MSM entity, U.S. News, vilifies the use of polls inaccurately predicting election results. in 2012 his own campaign's polls, among others, predicted Mitt Romney, the republican's nominee, would defeat President Barack Obama for the presidency. But just barely two years later surveys in Kentucky strongly suggested then-Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, perhaps the shortest, most powerful republican in Washington, could lose his seat to an upstart rookie democrat. Obviously neither event ever came close to happening.

The political experts don't trust polls. Tess Uurken [?], a polling expert at Rutgers University stated that polls can no longer make fine distinctions. People can trust polls on broad issues, like what voters are most concerned about, but not so much on the political horse race.

Selinda Lake, a pollster, political consultant and President of Microsearch Partners, a Washington DC based polling firm, says polling has seen kind of a steady decline. It's getting harder to reach people. It's also harder to get them to cooperate.

Michael Traggart is a University of Michigan political science professor who specializes in polling and opinion surveys and he has stated that polls cannot be trusted for a variety of reasons, and that he is in agreement with Gallup when they say the industry is in need of a  major overhaul.

What many of these experts are referring to is the death of the legitimacy of public opinion polls due to insufficient sample size. When polls do not have enough participants, the results cannot be considered to be valid. The way that polls cover up this deficiency is to report an official sounding statistic that gives fake legitimacy to the results.

For example, the poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 3%. In actuality, a legitimate poll would stay something like the statistical confidence level with regard to the accuracy of this poll is 95% or higher. The representation of this notion is usually expressed as a level of confidence, and it looks like this: PE = .05. If you don't see this statistic, the poll, on its face, is unreliable.

The Tavistock Institute and the Use of Public Opinion Polls Dating Back to 1913
The Tavistock Institute used polls to shape public opinion into accepting Britain's entry into World War One. The plan to create public opinion through the fake reporting of bogus polling data began as a propaganda factory centering on dwellings and houses in London. Sir Edward Grey, the British Foreign Secretary at the time, installed Lord Northcliff, Britain's most influential newspaper magnate, as its director. Lord Northcliff's position was supervised by Lord Rothmee on behalf of the British Crown.

The operational staff of Wellington House onsisted of Lord Northcliff and Arnold Twomey. According to John Coleman--John Coleman, the author of the classic book Conspirators' Hierarchy: The Committee of 300, was one of the first writers to call attention to the existence of Tavistock in 1969. And the rest, as they say, is history.

Subsequently, we learned from Coleman's book that polls were designed to not really measure public opinion, they were designed to shape public opinion. One of he chief methods that unscrupulous polls use to report fake results is to select a biased sample. For example, if one is using phone samplings to gather voting preferences, one merely needs to target neighborhoods which historically favor one party over the other in order to get the predetermined results that one is looking for.

This violates the principle of random selection of subjects to poll and this completely invalidates any survey results. In polling, the fox should not be allowed to watch the henhouse.

There is yet another factor in the creation of fake polling results and it has to do with who's conducting the surveys and who owns the polling company through direct ownership or subsidiary holdings. For example, when CBS News conducts a survey, they are not going to work against their own organization.

The Rockefellers used to own CBS directly. Today, through a complicated set of intertwining and overlapping boards of directorate and subsidiary holdings, their controller, the CBS is obfuscated from public view. Nevertheless, they still control CBS and every poll about their selection from this organization must be viewed with suspicion. Why? Rockefeller Industries are some of the chief beneficiaries of the free trade agreements. David Rockefeller is permitted to close down American factories and unemploy millions of workers while seeking cheap labor in third world countries. His corporations are allowed to ship these foreign made products laced with the blood of  unemployed American workers, duty-free. This is national economic suicide.

And then here comes Donald Trump on his white horse and he says he's going to tax these imports 35% in an attempt to keep American jobs in America. There is no way that CBS polling is going to be allowed to report that Donald Trump is ever leading in the polls.

The public opinion polls are designed to get the public to forsake Donald Trump on the premise that he cannot win. This is a conclusion fostered by trickery in the polling industry. One can repeat this scenario over and over for each significant poll which is taken and reported to the American people. Polls cannot be trusted.

Conclusion: Americans must be careful to not put any stock into public opinion polls. If America will survive for any length of time, Hillary Clinton cannot be allowed to occupy the White House. Whether you like him or not, Trump will slow down the process of the globalists' takeover of America. He is the only option to the immediate and complete tyrannical takeover of America. We must be careful to not let phony polling results influence our perceptions and efforts in supporting Donald Trump. We are Anonymous. Expect us.


Well, here we go again. Media dirty tricks, fake polls from Politico, Quinnipiac, CBS, NBC manipulate polling data to show Hillary with lead over Trump. The liberal media is up to its usual tricks again. CBS: Clinton leads Trump by 10 in national poll; also Politico and Quinnipiac released a poll today that shows Hillary Clinton with a big 10 point lead over Donald Trump. But when you look at the data you see that they have a oversampled democrats and that the race is virtually tied. Even after the non-stop drubbing Trump is getting from the press on a daily basis.

[Sierra Rain, a dominican thinker] reported, "CBS is now pushing the pro-Hillary Clinton polls in rapid fashion", late on Wednesday. This media outlet released the results of a national poll claiming to show that Clinton holds a 6% advanctage over Donald Trump in the direct head-to-head match-up. Apparently the poll was conducted by telephone June 9-13, 2016, among a random sample of 1280  adults nationwide, including 1038 registered voters. the data has been weighted to reflect U.S. census figures on demographic variables.

However, based on the finer details, the final weighted sample of 976 registered voters is made up of just 28% republicans and 35% democrats. In the unweighted sample of registered voters, the relative percentage by party was 29% republicans and 35% democrats. So during the weighting process the polling increased the democrat/republican spread from 6% to 7%. This relative weighting should have been headed in the other direction.

According to national polling data, republican party affiliation has averaged 28% for 2016 so far, and it also averaged 28% since the start of May. This agrees well with the CBS news poll's composition. On the other hand, the last time the democrats were at 35% was in early March of 2013. Since May of this year, democratic party affiliation has averaged 29%, just one percent higher than the republicans, not 7% higher.

As a result, this CBS poll appears to be biased in favor of the democrats by the same margin that CLinton purportedly holds over Trump, meaning that if the bias is removed, so is Clinton's lead and we have a statistical tie.

Likewise, NBC reported Hillary Clinton opened up a 7 point lead over Donald Trump this week, but once again, if you correct for oversampling of democrats you find the race is virtually tied. The Daily Mail reported: Hillary Clinton has opened up a 7 point lead over Donald Trump on an online poll that seems to reflect a bounce for the former Secretary of State, after she wrapped up the democratic nomination last week.

But the weekly tracking poll from NBC and the Sevenyoke Company included the opinions of 7% more self-identified democrats than republicans - the same margin as the polls --- result. That raises questions about the 49/42 result. The most recent Gallup polling on the subject published in January, found the democrats had just a 3% advantage nationally. In that same survey, republican dominated states outnumbered those populated mostly by democrats by a 20/12 margin.

The fraud is clear when Quinnipiac does a poll today out of 1479 voters, 70% have been deemed to be democrats - they are false numbers. And then you have the pundits in the media saying Clinton will win in a landslide.

The bullshit is getting deep, folks, get your boots out. We are Anonymous.



* Trump Leading 67% to Clinton's 19% in National Poll of 50,000 Voters:

* Trump leading 64% to Clinton's 36% in ZIP Poll of 100,000 Voters:

* New Information Supports Trump Landslide:

* Support for Trump Vastly Underreported:

* Trump Rally Nearly Every Day! Up To 35,000 Supporters! Standing Room Only! 400+ To Date! Media Ignores!:

* 87% certainty Trump will win:

* Google Trends Indicate Trump Landslide

* Media Rigging The Polls, Hiding New Evidence Proving Trump Is Winning:

* Trump is leading in a landslide at 70%:

* Media Hiding Proof Trump is Winning:

* These numbers don't lie! Donald Trump is 10 times more popular than Clinton:

* Internal Polls: Trump Landslide!:

* Proof The Polls Are Rigged & Trump Is Winning:

* Insider Warns Of Election Fraud - Info Wars:

* Trump Recruits Monitors for Polling Places:

* Electronic Voting Machine Fix Caught on Camera! Voter Selects Republican, Goes to Democrat!

* Where Are The Invisible Hillary Supporters?:

* 50,000 Supporters Wait in Line for 12 Hours for Florida Trump Rally:

* Same Day, 30 Supporters Show up for Florida Kaine Rally:

* Media Hiding Proof Trump is Winning:

* Fake Websites, Fake Polls, Fake News, Fake Leaks:

* Voting Machine Caught on Camera Casting Ballot for Democrat when Selecting Republican!

* New National Poll of 50k People Has Dramatically Different Outcome Than Media Polling:

* Majority of snap polls show Trump won all three debates by a landslide:

* Trump By A Landslide:

* Professor Allan Lichtman says Donald Trump is headed for a win - he's predicted 30 years of presidential outcomes correctly:

* Online Poll: TRUMP 90% / CLINTON 10%:

* Here's The 30 Seconds After The Last Debate That CNN Would Rather You Didn't See:

* ANONYMOUS: Why Trump will Win and Why The Polls are Rigged!:


* ANONYMOUS: Media Hiding New Evidence of Landslide Win:

* Six Globalist Media Giants Own 90% of What We Read, Watch, or Listen To...

* 91% of the Media Coverage of Populist Trump Is Hostile:

* The Media Can Legally Lie...

* Only 6% Trust The Media:


Few people get asked if they'll consider running for president, all of them exceptional.. Donald Trump has been asked repeatedly for over 35 years. Here are 3 of those times...

* 1980 Donald Trump Interview with Rona Barrett:

* 1988 Donald Trump Interview with Oprah Winfrey:

* 1989 Tour de Trump:

* Trump's art of the deal - Dispute your bills:

* Faster & Cheaper, Trump Finishes NYC's Wollman Ice Rink

* Trump reports Large Profit From Wollman Rink

* Black Pastors endorse Donald Trump:

* The Trump Family I Know ~ by Lynne Patton:

*"[T'he dearest, most thoughtful, most loyal, most caring man"

* Why I Support Donald Trump: He's The New Roosevelt:

* President of the Peoples Party of Belgium Praises Donald Trump:

* Furious former Miss California is not letting NY Times get away with hit piece lies:

* Ex-girlfriend hits back at NY Times' shocking way she says it changed her words:



Mr. Trump's celestial calendar for the coming year.. a time to reap & a time to sow...

volunteer at...

Facebook C-Span Youtube Twitter Instagram Trump News The Trump Org

Donald J. Trump.com

WIRED: Trump's Campaign Is Launching a Nightly News Show on Facebook

If you have more info/links to add, please email them to: trumplandslide@lingood.com - thanks!